Well and in itself, Kagarlitskiy in any way could not forget about Khodorkovskom and Kas'yanove. First, certainly, appears the innocent victim of terrible tyranny, suffering from own honesty:

«Mikhail Khodorkovskiy and YUKOS became too influential not only politically but also came forward the pioneers of «bleaching» of business. Thus they did it not on a concordance with power, within the framework someone general agreement about the new rules of game, and arbitrary, affronting to both bureaucracy and colleagues on business» (p. 480).

Kas'yanov in a book plays role of hotshot fighter, long time selflessly alone braking reforms. Naturally, winning over System is not been in strength even to such hero, so that «Kas'yanov became a next sacral victim, brought on the altar of liberal reforms» (p. 489).

From time to time, Kagarlitskiy tries to operate not so crudely made. A result however appears deplorable. For example, at first it is possible to read the flaming exposure of corruption of guidance of KPRF:

«From point of Khodorkovskogo, hoping to limit absolute power of Putin by expansion of plenary powers of parliament, collaboration with KPRF, by leading party of thought opposition, looked fully logically. Regardless of ideology, a tactical coincidence of interests was present. But guidance of KPRF from the side tactical alliance with Khodorkovskim to explain was unable. It in general explained to nothing the supporters, because followed not political, but commercial logic: services in an exchange on money. As one of the left journalists noticed maliciously, the leaders of party showed «psychology of shallow shopkeepers». By paradoxical appearance in short-term partnership of communists and Khodorkovskogo preeminently the first tried to operate as merchants, and second — as a politician. .Московский industrialist Sabbas of Frosts inlaid considerable money in party of bolshevists. However much the revolutionaries of that time strikingly differed from the thought politicians of epoch of El'tsina and Putin. .Проблема KPRF consisted not of that they tried to get money at Berezovskogo, and got at Khodorkovskogo. Party guidance not simply took money at oligarchic structures, but it did, having neither hard principles nor clear policy. As a result a collaboration with sponsors grew into a vulgar commercial transaction» (p. 465 – 468).

And it is a bit farther possible to read a passionate ode Ilya Ponomarevu, uttery hardness to dissociate its sales of YUKOsu from an act:

«In same queue supporters of the left course and update of party were mainly among young people. Obnovlentsy began to form group round an informative-technological center (ITTS KPRF), headed Ilya Ponomarevym (journalists here nicknamed him the “leader of youth wing of party”). Soon after elections party guidance disembodied ITTS KPRF, but it could not stop the coming to a head rebelling already. In January after the beginning of parliamentary elections Union of communist young people (SKM) even without the special influence of Ponomareva renounced to support a party candidate in presidents and came forward for boycott of elections. Youth left front was created, where alternative communist organizations and entered also.

As a near to Youth left front newspaper “The Tyumenskiy worker” wrote, an unifying process stimulated sweepings changes in all groups engaged in him. Creation of MLF resulted “in walking away from ideological battles to the battles class, to the battles of the real policy”. Unlike the left groups 1990th, which frequently remained ideological clubs, MLF aimed to become the “corporation of direct action”».