Why preeminently a musical was saved and develops on a background a crisis and disintegration of all soviet (from the cinema to literature)? Probably because it never was fully and organically related to soviet tradition. Its origin is on beginning of 70th and in any way it is unconnected with continuation or revival of revolutionary impulse. It arose up under influence of western, was imported together with mini-skirts, jeans and other displays of western protest of 1978-72 years. Antibourgeois sense of this protest remained hidden for majority of the east Europe young people, but the charm of style was irrepressible. The antibourgeoisness was replaced simplified and at times by very cheap nonconformism, directed already against own conservative bureaucracy. Thus, the «Russian fate» from the beginning found and own, fully organic acquittal, and own enemy. He fully got accustomed on Russian (or Ukrainian) soil, but model, that never determined itself as part soviet or even anti-soviet cultures. He simply developed at this time and on this territory.

Since east Europe cultural space «opened» up for the western breathings, it in the earliest possible dates began to find the personal touches of provinciality, by the enthusiastically perceived part of society as proof of modernization and «attaching to the civilized world». However together with western cultural standards were east brought viruses of cultural radicalism. After 10-15 years revealed, that these viruses had got on exceptionally beneficial soil.

This book can be ordered on our site (on Russia, except for Moscow) or purchase to address: Bookstore of "Falanster", B. Kozikhinskiy trudged.,10, 504-4795, From 11 to 20, except for a ss.

A book which examines went out at last, that not typically for most historical researches published now, history of the State Russian from point of authentic scientific analysis. Until now, as well as the last years existences of the USSR, so presently, at writing of works on domestic history principle ruled cleanly subjective approach. Even school and institute of higher textbooks were written or from liberal-masochistic positions, characteristic for the first years and carbon-monoxide «fumes» of re-erecting, when all Russian, and the more so the soviet was presented as a historical anomaly, or from more and more fashionable positions of theories, «How hardly not Vlut, givings events related to Russian mystic character and interpreting our history as train of wills of charismatic personalities. Not to mention about the theory of Fomenko-Nosovskogo, essence of which, taken to that historical science, it is an even not designer of «Lego», from which it is possible to collect any, most fantastic construction, and a piece of certain clay is in the hands of intellectual.

Going of Boris Kagarlitskogo near the analysis of historical processes is not something on principle new. It is further development of the marxist, dialectical going near the comprehension of the pas.

In the domestic history an author leans against prevailing in the first years of soviet power, so-called «school of Pokrovskogo».

"Mikhail Pokrovskiy was the student of the prominent Russian historian Vasiliy Osipovicha Klyuchevskogo. Pokrovskiy formulated the ideas in cruel opposition with dominating then in historical science by ideas. Highly estimating comparatively "neutral" Solov'eva, he obviously the looks to the liberal views on the pas of Russia and promised Russian history from the materialistic point of view. Pokrovskiy applied thus, foremost to the reader the «brains of which are not dislocated the school textbooks of history».