In countries with the administrative-command system the decision of tasks had specific features. In accordance with the dominating ideological settings the task of determination of volume and structure of products was considered too serious and responsible, to pass its decision direct producers — to the industrial enterprises, collective farms and state farms. Therefore the pattern of public requirements was determined directly the central planned organs. However, as to go into detail and foresee the change of public requirements in such scales it is impossible on principle, these organs followed the task of satisfaction of minimum necessities mainly.

Centralized distributing of material welfares, labour and financial resources carried out without participation of direct producers and users in accordance with beforehand chosen as "public" aims and criteria on the basis of the centralized planning. Considerable part of resources in obedience to the dominating ideological settings headed for development of military industrial complex.

Distributing of the created products between the participants of production was hardly regulated central organs by means of the everywhere applied tariff system, and also centralized the asserted norms of facilities, sent in a wage-fund. It conduced to predominance of approach in payment of labour.

Lack of viability of this system, its unflexibility and sluggishness in regard to introduction of achievements of NTR, inability to provide passing to the intensive type of economic development served reason of socio-economic transformations to the entire former socialistic countries. Today strategy of economic reforms in these countries is though determined of development of world civilization, however fully depends on internal possibilities of every state. At determination of strategy of development of regions of Russia internal possibilities of territories of country are also taken into account.

For ancient people a market arose up as episodically repeating oneself procedure of exchange operations, more frequent than all related to the sacral actions. Our pictures of market, naturally, are a more scale. But market essence is the intercourse of salespeople and buyers based on mutual interest. Motto And. Smita: "Give me that is wanted by me, and I will give that is wanted by you" and holds good till today you.

A market allows to realize private interests of salespeople and buyers, orients the separate participants of exchange operations in their further activity, helps to make decision that to produce, in what sizes, by what methods, providing general economic development the same.

That historically and it is logically necessary for the origin of market relations? At first, salespeople of commodity must be his proprietors. Within the framework of communal property a separate producer can not own a product, I.e. freely to boss them. Converting of commodity exchange into the regular phenomenon is firmly related to distribution of peculiar. It provides a right for an order (sales) and at the same time creates the personal personal interest in reduction of prices of producing goods, improvement of his quality and consumer properties.