Naturally, most a place in a book is spared western marxism: To Frankfurt school, Gramshi, to Paris 68 years. For some reason sure that connoisseurs these that, if gather strengths will familiarize with the book of Kagarlitskogo will find there not little amusing fantasies.

Lightness in ideas at Kagarlitskogo, what to talk unusual. Only some statements.

«When people with high qualification enter the market of labour in the sector of low qualification, they inflict frightful harm that, who operates at this market, because do that work better».

Again there are no quotations, not Refs.s on some researches of this question. Where that undertakes from? And on my opinion, all quite reverse. I, for example, very doubt that Kagarlitskiy better will brush a garbage chute clean and will clean an entrance, what our aunt Luba from Voronezh.

«Soviet programmers managed on less powerful computers to get results with that speed, that Americans - on more powerful. Americans simply depended upon the «iron», and our – no, they him yet at programmatic level perfected».

What programmers, what results, where and when? I heard here, that our first computers had been stronger western. But it all is small talks.

And about reasons of bad relation of Marksa to Gertsenu:

«And nevertheless in regard to Marksa there is some irrational fear to Gertsenu. He is frightened by that socialists appeared among Russians. For him the not grounded, unexpressly formulated fear is nothing, that in Russia some unnatural crossing of socialistic ideas can happen with imperial ideology».

Where it is the «unexpressly formulated fear»? All of it is quite unfounded assertions again. I here just the same fears for Marksa concerning Russia will not recall. It can be they too are «unexpressly formulated»? Although I, for example, perfectly remember fears of classics concerning taking for socialism of any measures of state interference with an economy. Here, that writes on this occasion Engels Bernshteynu on March, 12, 1881:

«It is clean mercenary, falsification to name «socialism» every interference of the state with a free competition – patronized duties, guilds, tobacco monopoly, of separate industries of industry.»

Or here, that suddenly begins to assert Kagarlitskiy on behalf of Engels:

«Elsewhere that Engels unexpectedly and prophetically begins to reflect about dictatorship of party. If a working class is weak, power of class grows into power of party, and party becomes authoritarian. This will be not dictatorship of proletariat, but dictatorship of party. Eventually dictatorship of one party will turn around domination of one leader, dictatorship of one person not only above a proletariat but also above party».

Again, where these reflections of Engels. All of it anymore look like the reflections of some modern mossy, but in any way not Engels. Will take chance to assert that such reflections for Engels are not present. Kagarlitskiy tells simply insolently, inventing every nonsenses on behalf of Engels.