Yes, in the USSR the loss of socialistic conquests happened after the construction of socialism and decades of socialistic development. But if we glorify parisian communards, remaining only 70 days, then as highly we must put the exploit of generations of soviet people, standings on end 70 years in hostile capitalist surroundings, forced after victory of socialism to conduct an incessant fight against the birth-marks of capitalism up country and with permanent attempts to prang socialism, undertaken from outside.

In history, as marxism teaches, there are flights and falling, forward movement and returning back. But it unknown the selfdeclared "marxist" Kagarlitskomu, and he in place of monument prepared brand soviet fighters and creators of socialism, asserting that "backdated thesis of Trotskogo about impossibility of socialism in one country it is possible to consider confirmed facts". But facts talk about other — that while power in the USSR followed marxism-leninism, socialism existed and developed successfully, though in one country. And when many socialistic countries became, but guidance of Soviet Union, since Khrushcheva, entered on the way of revisionism, socialism collapsed in the USSR. What it proves? That way of revisionism, way of waiver of main in marxism — from studies about dictatorship of proletariat is a way to restoration of capitalism. And the anti-marxist market understanding of socialism is accelerating of motion on this disastrous way.

Value of socialistic revolution in Russia of Kagarlitskiy as though and acknowledges, but the same as Trotskiy, — only as a factor of approaching of world revolution.

Kagarlitskiy, blinded, demonstrates the complete inability to reason not only, but also simply logically. In fact that the fixed assets of production in the middle of 30th appeared to the USSR in communal property, is a historical fact. And a line-up, based on communal property, is named a communism. Originally a communism from a capitalism arises up upon termination of transitional period as incomplete, immature, undeveloped, that as socialism, and from the historical fact of construction in the USSR of socialism going away is impossible.

В.И. Lenin the merit of proof belongs to that the state at socialism remains the form of dictatorship of proletariat to the wipeout of classes, that to the construction of complete communism. And it is underline by Lenin in-process "Great initiative", which Kagarlitskiy mentions not only, but straight decides on it in connection with determination of classes and here manages to go round a question about dictatorship of proletariat. But marxist only that, who takes confession of fight of classes to confession of dictatorship of proletariat.

But as claim of Kagarlitskogo will please you, that in Russia after revolution "advices were created on territorial principle", while it is common knowledge that principle of their education is a production — from factories and factories, but not from streets and areas? That it is incompetence or direct deception and in general trusting Kagarlitskomu in exposition of marxist truths is impossible. How to trust, if he even at quoting is engaged in garblings. Pretending, that he expounds position of Stalin on a national question, he even as though quoted his determination of nation, but quoted unright, throwing out selected by us by a bold face font keywords that nation is the historically folded community of people, arising up on the base of community of language, territories et cetera And it turned out that nation is not community of people, but community of language, territories etc., that complete abracadabra. And this garbling is given on a page 386 under heading of "oddity of determination", although just right to give heading of "oddity of quoting". Correlation of nation and state of Kagarlitskiy presents in complete opposition marxism, declaring that the "state, in same queue, creates nations", while a process of formation of nations is process which in any way can not be taken to creation of nations will of the state.